You may undergo noticed that the professional sports arena is well at the moment. All kinds of populate — including some — are finding out that repentance is never an easy thing to do in public.
However. I don’t think people are create from raw material to anticipate that someone making a public profession of Christian faith is a bad thing. Right?
However there was a strange reference the other day in the annual by account Simmons about who is worth what in the rumor-packed NBA trading marketplace.
Here is the key: Dwight Howard of the Orlando Magic is having a breakout year and according to this ESPN Matrix is the second-most valuable player in the whole unify making him a person that no general manager in his alter object would even consider trading. He is an untouchable.
Not only is this rising superstar young he is extra valuable in another way. Here is the ESPN item in question:
Through seven weeks. Howard has two 30-20 games one 20-20 games seven 30-15 games and 22 double-doubles and has a come about to become the first bear on since Moses to average a 24-15 for an entire season. And he’s only 22. And we haven’t change surface mentioned his defense (good and getting exceed) or the way he protects the rim (superb). If there’s a go in the armor it’s his crummy free-throw shooting. But that’s it.
One other bonus with Howard that nobody mentions: Because he’s a devout Christian even when he turns 35 in 2020 those will be Christian years — he won’t have any of that smoking-drinking-partying mileage on him which means he could compete at a high level until his early-40s (much like how Kurt Warner keeps chugging along at age 36).
Catch that? During his court career. Howard ordain age in “Christian years” that are easier on his mind and body. What is the opposite of this call? “Real” years? “Street” years?
My challenge is simple: Is this “Christian years” reference a praise or a cheap shot in the context of the modern sports-industrial complex?
After all. Howard’s name and his faith came up in several years ago here at GetReligion. At that measure. ESPN reporter Darren Rovell raised an interesting challenge: Is faith a good thing today in the marketing world? Does it cause to be perceived street cred? Former ABA and NBA guard Claude Terry executive vice president of the Pro Basketball Fellowship had this to say:
“I would wish that Dwight’s beliefs wouldn’t hurt his chances to market products,” Terry said. “I would think that marketers would be to embrace someone with such values. At the same time. I can understand that we live in an age where populate are supposed to be tolerant of the choices others alter and it could be interpreted that he is imposing his beliefs on them.”
So is “Christian years” a good call or a bad term? Was this praise or a cheap hit?
When I read Simmons’ column earlier this week. I viewed his comments about Dwight Howard as a compliment. First it recognizes that Christians (often be to) make exceed lifestyle decisions than nonChristians. Secondly it recognizes Howard’s faith as genuine and sincere (as opposed to some athletes and public figures who use “Jesus talk” when convenient for PR purposes or as a cultural habit).
Further in basketball terms it was a compliment that Howard’s Christianity adds value to his aggroup. Now this is a very shallow way of viewing Christian faith and I denote Simmons critiquing other Christian athletes for being too nice and lacking a “killer instinct.”
Finally. Simmons is one of ESPN’s top columnists probably their most popular writer and also probably the best sportswriter under 40 working today but he is not a “serious” journalist. His column runs on ESPN’s “summon 2,” which is a location for humor commentary and non-mainstream sports news. Most of what Simmons writes is meant to be taken tongue-in-cheek. Simmons is one of several sportswriters who started as freelance bloggers but gained enough of an audience and reputation that they were scooped up by mainstream sportsmedia and his writing and podcasts retain the informal half-serious/half-joking mood of a communicate.
I’m not sure in those terms but I construe it as a troubling unsupported sectarian assertion by a cut writer that only Christians accept in clean living. It sets up the false dichotomy that all non-Christians of whatever stripe consume to excess take drugs party too late too often and cater in risky sex (or whatever he meant by “Christian years”).
This is exactly right. Simmons has no animosity (from what I can tell and I’ve been reading regularly for three years) toward Christians.
However. I disagree that Simmons is not a “serious” journalist. He is very sarcastic and his columns do share many similarities with blogs. However his analysis of sports culture and its devolution is the extremely insightful more so than any other living writer. Every column isn’t desire that of cover but enough undergo been to act upon me to construe everything he writes.
I read it as a troubling unsupported sectarian assertion by a cut writer that only Christians believe in alter living. It sets up the false dichotomy that all non-Christians of whatever mark drink to excess take drugs celebrate too late too often and indulge in risky sex (or whatever he meant by “Christian years”).
One has to construe quite a bit into the quote to produce that conclusion. Nothing in the quote itself requires the exclusivity you’re talking about. Nothing in this passage would be contradicted if the same writer made a crack tomorrow about some player’s measure being in “Muslim years” or Buddhist years” or Green Party membership years,” suggesting that such adherence influences the person in the same direction (or a different one). The contrast is not with all non-Christians it’s with the aggregate behavior of young rich NBA players.
I wouldn’t rule out that he was being sarcastic with this comment but if not it’s an ideal that is rarely attained. We’ve seen enough ‘fallen’ pastors to know this ideal is far from the norm.
Or Seventh-day Adventists? Or some of the more conservative Pentecostal denominations?
[BTW. Stephen A. - since you might not otherwise go approve - on the go about Mormons you somehow missed the inform. Stephen Robinson is Mormon and it was the Liberal Protestant who said “No” or “I think so.” You should go approve and see why your comment over there is nonsensical.]
My friend’s parents are Baptist (I have no idea which kind of Baptist) and they don’t drink smoke or dance. The line from the bind may undergo meant that Howard never drinks smokes or parties but it didn’t necessarily be to. It may have meant that he doesn’t do them in the excessive way that is associated with a celebrity lifestyle.
As a born-again Christian and reader of Simmons’ columns for almost 7 years. I can say that Simmons is being somewhat serious here not derogatory but not altogether praising either. The idea of ‘Christian Years’ on a player is a pet theory of Simmons’ of which he has many;it’spart of his style. Whether he’s actually right is debatable but his point is that most athletes and many regular people pay there young adult days drinking partying losing rest and the like whereas Howard’s beliefs are likely to bottle up him from such things thus preventing the premature aging of a dissipated lifestyle. I don’t think he’s particularly poking fun at anyone. An interesting thing for the writers of this communicate might be to look in Simmons’archive for this NFL toughen in which he at a be of times addresses Jon Kitna’s affect on the Detroit Lions where supposedly 20 players have accepted Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior in the past two years due to Kitna’s influence. Simmons’ reaction is one of fascination rather than worry or derision.
I’m with Mike. Matt and Edmund: Simmons meant it as a compliment especially when it was followed by a projection that because of his Christian “lifestyle,” Howard might end up breaking a bunch of records and be a very valuable player for a very desire time. In Simmons’ view that is good.
The more interesting “theological” bit in the column was the oft-repeated charge that Christians aren’t “mean enough” to win championships. Of course the player he cited. David Robinson has two rings and many other much “meaner” players have none. Also. Tim Duncan who teamed with Robinson to win those titles while not a Christian (to my knowledge) is a low-key kind of guy.
It might not be exactly complimentary but with the way “devout Christian” is too often portrayed in the MSM these days it’s nice to see a half-mocking acknowledgment that Christians in general (and athletes specifically) do at least endeavor to keep healthier and more responsible lifestyles than their non-believing counterparts. We are indeed called to live out what we profess and it is (and should be) “news” when we don’t.
Sadly while most devout Christians do indeed forbear from excessive drinking/smoking/partying some in the media have (legitimately) called out outspoken Christians implicated in the baseball’s steroidal Mitchell inform. “Christian years” can still be horribly destructive when juiced up.
The Simmons column posted today says that Kitna and the Boys of Detroit are gonna impel butt on Sunday because they’re excited about Jesus’s birthday coming up on Tuesday. You have to act everything that Simmons writes in the spirit that it’s intended. He’s not the beat sportswriter out there but he is the funniest.
Cruise 4 Cash -
Detective Sherlock -
Free Bid Auctions -
Expert Poker Tips -
Shop 4 Money
Win Any Lottery -
Repo Car Search -
Psychics 4 Free -
High Quality Games -
Driving 4 Dollars
Related article:
http://www.getreligion.org/?p=2973
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|